Election 2010

2010 Year in Review
Election 2010
October 28th: Art Facility and Community Economic Development Symposium
Letter from the ED - Summer 2010
Letter from the ED - Spring 2010
Letter from the ED - Winter 2010
Letter from the Executive Director - Fall 09
Letter from the Executive Director - Summer 09
Commercial Space Opportunities
Financing Resources
About Us

November 2, 2010 - A Vote for New Leadership

This is an exciting time.  National, state, and city fiscal woes notwithstanding, the Tenderloin has reason to be optimistic.  After years of one-size-fits-all monolithic thinking about the needs of the neighborhood we will have new leadership in the form of a new District Supervisor.   Here's a vote for new leadership that will advocate on behalf of equitable development for the Tenderloin. 

I first heard the term "equitable development" several years ago while working with Miguel Garcia, at the time a pioneering Ford Foundation community development program officer.   The folks at PolicyLink have a nice summary of the concept:

Equitable development is an approach to creating healthy, vibrant, communities of opportunity.  Four principles undergird equitable development:

  1. Integrate strategies that focus on people with those focused on improving places;
  2. Reduce local and regional disparities;
  3. Promote investments that are catalytic, coordinated, and result in a triple bottom line; and
  4. Ensure meaningful community participation, leadership, and ownership in change efforts.


Moving the Tenderloin toward a more equitable, healthy and balanced place will be a key and difficult challenge for the next district supervisor.  If you spend time in the Tenderloin you'll frequently hear residents and CBO employees talk of a "Containment Zone."  This refers to the belief many in the neighborhood share that the city uses the Tenderloin to shoulder the burden of all its poverty-related challenges, resulting in a very high concentration of extremely low or no-income/supportive and special-needs housing, crisis intervention social services, public inebriation and open-air drug trafficking.  

On the plus side, there are outstanding Tenderloin housing and social service organizations and individuals working on some of these issues.  That said, what do you do when the needs of at-risk, vulnerable populations are in conflict with each other?  Generic and simplistic notions of "Justice" and "Empowerment" and "Progressive" get complicated when we look at these conflicts, especially when we obligate our marginalized citizens to sort it out for themselves on one block, or in one neighborhood.  (Eighty-three percent of San Francisco's supportive housing is located in the Tenderloin and Mission.  Progressive? Or Tea Party-esque?)   Whose justice and empowerment are you talking about?  Opposing, seemingly intractable needs call the question: Can you be progressive, conservative, liberal, moderate, when you need to be?  And in the face of attacks from whichever ideological camp you're challenging on a given issue?  

One good place to start would be to stop the policies and practices that result in these inequities.   To do that we must examine and own up to the role we play in perpetuating status quo inequities that afflict Tenderloin residents.  It's more complicated than simply pointing the finger at city hall or Sacramento.      

We enthusiastically look forward to a new Board Supervisor who will stand up for the Tenderloin.  Still, the next time we complain about city agencies and dogmatic political leaders abusing us we should remember what Martin Luther King said:

A man can't ride your back unless it's bent.